What+she+was+doing+was+wrong.

What She was doing was wrong
Here are some links to background research: [|Measuring Fair Use] [|Suit on Copyright and TV: Myspace] [|Of Copyright, CSPAN and Commercials]

Here are my five best arguments to make my claim ... And the answer, in Maya's case, for both of the above questions is no. || Here are 3 arguments that might come from the other side and what I will say to argue against it Here are some broader situations which apply to this case:
 * 1 || She did not change the meaning (Still just people fighting). According to the article on http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/9-b.html, the following questions must be asked when considering the legitimacy of a work...
 * Has the material you have taken from the original work been transformed by adding new expression or meaning?
 * Was value added to the original by creating new information, new aesthetics, new insights and understandings?
 * 2 || She used previously copywritten music from a CD she bought. ||
 * 3 || She did not credit the use of the Jerry Springer Show or the opera artist. ||
 * 4 || The Jerry Springer Show had the potential market for what she did. A case of precedence in which to refer to, from http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/9-b.html, is //Rogers v. Koons//, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992). In the case an artist used a copyrighted photograph without permission as the basis for wood sculptures, copying all of the elements of the photo. The artist earned several hundred thousand dollars selling the sculptures. When the photographer sued, the artist claimed his sculptures were a fair use because the photographer would never have considered making sculptures. The court disagreed, stating that it did not matter whether the photographer had considered making sculptures; what mattered was that a potential market for sculptures of the photograph existed. ( //Rogers v. Koons//, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992).) ||
 * 5 || The Jerry Springer Show is the copywrite owner of the footage. No matter how short Maya's clip may have been, The Jerry Springer Show owns it and has the legal ability to take action against those who use the show without their consent. ||
 * || Counter-Argument || What I will Say to respond: ||
 * 1 || She didn't use enough of the show to make it ethically wrong. || Any use of this show no matter the length is not fair use if they don't get permission ||
 * 2 || She may have recorded the music her self. || It's not proven ||
 * 3 || Lots of people make videos like that online and they don't get in trouble so why should she? || If everyone jumped off a bridge does that make it right? ||